Immigrants from Ukraine vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ukraine
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ukraine
Creek
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
18.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ukraine vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 289,659,329 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.915 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 35.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ukraine | Creek |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 88.9% | 30.8% |
Range | 87.4% | 28.5% |
Mean | 8.9% | 12.5% |
Median | 6.3% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ukraine by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ukraine are Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |