Immigrants from Moldova vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Moldova
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Moldova
Creek
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Moldova vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,381,325 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 41.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Moldova | Creek |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 17.5% | 30.8% |
| Range | 16.3% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 12.5% |
| Median | 6.1% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Moldova by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |