Immigrants from Western Europe vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Europe
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Western Europe
Creek
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
31.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Europe vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,880,740 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 36.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Western Europe | Creek |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 75.4% | 30.8% |
| Range | 73.5% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 12.5% |
| Median | 7.6% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Europe by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Europe are Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |