Iroquois vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Iroquois
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Iroquois
Creek
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,272,935 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 19.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Creek |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 40.9% | 30.8% |
| Range | 37.9% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 12.5% |
| Median | 9.2% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Chippewa (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Micronesia (7.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |