Immigrants from Cambodia vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cambodia
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cambodia
Creek
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
21.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,130,824 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 35.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cambodia | Creek |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 37.9% | 30.8% |
| Range | 36.1% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 9.7% | 12.5% |
| Median | 6.9% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cambodia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cambodia are Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |