Cajun vs Lumbee Male Disability
COMPARE
Cajun
Lumbee
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Cajuns
Lumbee
14.4%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Lumbee Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,697,026 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,279,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 6.1%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 8.4% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 34.1% | 38.1% |
| Range | 25.7% | 35.8% |
| Mean | 17.7% | 18.5% |
| Median | 16.2% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.0% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Lumbee by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Navajo (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Chippewa (14.3%, a difference of 0.57%), Potawatomi (14.2%, a difference of 1.0%), Native/Alaskan (14.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Tohono O'odham (14.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Chickasaw (15.1%, a difference of 0.74%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |