Cherokee vs Lumbee Male Disability
COMPARE
Cherokee
Lumbee
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Cherokee
Lumbee
14.8%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Lumbee Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,554,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,279,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 2.7%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 6.7% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 60.0% | 38.1% |
| Range | 53.3% | 35.8% |
| Mean | 22.7% | 18.5% |
| Median | 21.4% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.3% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Lumbee by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Dutch West Indian (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Yuman (14.7%, a difference of 0.68%), Seminole (14.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Chickasaw (15.1%, a difference of 0.74%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.4% |