Comanche vs Lumbee Male Disability
COMPARE
Comanche
 Lumbee
 Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Comanche
Lumbee
14.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Lumbee Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,776,737 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 14.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,279,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 8.4%.
 
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Lumbee | 
| Minimum | 10.8% | 2.2% | 
| Maximum | 75.0% | 38.1% | 
| Range | 64.2% | 35.8% | 
| Mean | 22.9% | 18.5% | 
| Median | 18.7% | 18.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 15.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.7% | 21.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 6.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 5.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 5.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Lumbee by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Ottawa (14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Osage (14.0%, a difference of 0.33%), Apache (14.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Native/Alaskan (14.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Potawatomi (14.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Chickasaw (15.1%, a difference of 0.74%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 14.0%  | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 14.0%  | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 14.1%  | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 14.1%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 14.7%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 14.7%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 14.9%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 15.0%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 15.0%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 15.1%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 15.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 15.4%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 15.4%  |