Laotian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vision Disability
COMPARE
Laotian
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Laotians
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,815,117 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,413,823 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Minimum | 0.55% | 0.52% |
| Maximum | 7.1% | 10.1% |
| Range | 6.5% | 9.6% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.6% |
| Median | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.88% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Somali (2.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Russian (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (2.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Argentina (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.0% |