Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Jordanian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Jordanian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Jordanians
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Jordanian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,732,772 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,401,829 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 5.2%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Jordanian |
Minimum | 0.39% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 4.9% | 6.7% |
Range | 4.5% | 6.2% |
Mean | 2.8% | 2.9% |
Median | 2.8% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 3.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.89% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.88% | 1.0% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Colombia (2.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Nepal (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |