Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,642,193 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 23.4%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Chile	Chickasaw
Minimum	5.3%	3.8%
Maximum	48.3%	100.0%
Range	43.0%	96.2%
Mean	16.2%	26.8%
Median	13.6%	21.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.9%	17.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	16.7%	31.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.8%	13.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.2%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.9%	15.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.24%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Slavs	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 15.7%
Icelanders	82.4 /100 \| #148	Excellent 15.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	80.9 /100 \| #149	Excellent 15.8%
Immigrants \| Albania	80.7 /100 \| #150	Excellent 15.8%
Venezuelans	80.1 /100 \| #151	Excellent 15.8%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	79.4 /100 \| #152	Good 15.8%
Immigrants \| Nepal	78.5 /100 \| #153	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Chile	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 15.9%
Syrians	76.7 /100 \| #155	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Fiji	76.1 /100 \| #156	Good 15.9%
Colombians	76.1 /100 \| #157	Good 15.9%
Guamanians/Chamorros	75.3 /100 \| #158	Good 15.9%
Slovaks	75.2 /100 \| #159	Good 15.9%
French	72.8 /100 \| #160	Good 16.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	72.0 /100 \| #161	Good 16.0%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%