Immigrants from Chile vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Czechoslovakian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Czechoslovakians
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,580,502 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,413,881 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 5.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.64% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 6.4% | 39.0% |
| Range | 5.8% | 38.5% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 4.3% |
| Median | 1.9% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Sudanese (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Peru (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
| New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |