Immigrants from Serbia vs Creek Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Creek
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Creek
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Creek Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,728,789 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,415,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 60.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Creek |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 5.5% | 11.5% |
| Range | 5.1% | 10.8% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 4.5% |
| Median | 1.9% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.72% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.94% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.94% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Laotian (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Jordanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |