South African vs Creek Vision Disability
COMPARE
South African
Creek
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
South Africans
Creek
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
69.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Creek Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,556,547 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,415,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 49.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Creek |
| Minimum | 0.42% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 5.4% | 11.5% |
| Range | 5.0% | 10.8% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 4.5% |
| Median | 2.0% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.79% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Serbian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Pakistani (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Iraqi (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 74.6 /100 | #152 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 73.8 /100 | #153 | Good 2.1% |
| Slovenes | 73.6 /100 | #154 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 2.1% |
| Pakistanis | 71.6 /100 | #156 | Good 2.1% |
| Serbians | 70.2 /100 | #157 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 69.9 /100 | #158 | Good 2.1% |
| South Africans | 69.8 /100 | #159 | Good 2.1% |
| Austrians | 69.0 /100 | #160 | Good 2.1% |
| Iraqis | 67.7 /100 | #161 | Good 2.1% |
| Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
| Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |