Immigrants from Latvia vs Creek Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Creek
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Creek
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Creek Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,721,440 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,415,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 56.8%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Creek |
| Minimum | 0.29% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 6.0% | 11.5% |
| Range | 5.7% | 10.8% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 4.5% |
| Median | 2.0% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Chinese (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Western Asia (2.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Norwegian (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |