Immigrants from Albania vs Creek Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Albania
Creek
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Albania
Creek
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
90.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Albania vs Creek Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,388,317 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Albania and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.006 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,415,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 53.4%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Albania | Creek |
Minimum | 0.75% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 4.0% | 11.5% |
Range | 3.3% | 10.8% |
Mean | 2.0% | 4.5% |
Median | 1.9% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.68% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.66% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.66% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Albania by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Albania are Immigrants from Ukraine (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Scotland (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Venezuela (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |