Palestinian vs Creek Vision Disability
COMPARE
Palestinian
Creek
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Palestinians
Creek
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Creek Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,427,848 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,415,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 58.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Palestinian | Creek |
| Minimum | 0.30% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 6.4% | 11.5% |
| Range | 6.1% | 10.8% |
| Mean | 2.0% | 4.5% |
| Median | 1.9% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.81% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Palestinians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from North Macedonia (2.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Paraguayan (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (2.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (2.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | France | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Palestinians | 98.3 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Paraguayans | 98.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |