Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Creek Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Creek
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Creek
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Creek Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,057,261 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,415,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 59.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Creek |
| Minimum | 0.14% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 5.0% | 11.5% |
| Range | 4.8% | 10.8% |
| Mean | 1.9% | 4.5% |
| Median | 1.9% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.1% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.84% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.83% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Maltese (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Greece (2.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Russian (2.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | France | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Palestinians | 98.3 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |