Slavic vs Creek Vision Disability
COMPARE
Slavic
 Creek
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Slavs
Creek
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Creek Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,742,725 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,415,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 47.6%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Creek | 
| Minimum | 0.34% | 0.78% | 
| Maximum | 14.1% | 11.5% | 
| Range | 13.7% | 10.8% | 
| Mean | 2.9% | 4.5% | 
| Median | 2.3% | 3.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 3.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 5.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.3% | 
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% | 
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% | 
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% | 
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% | 
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% | 
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% | 
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% | 
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Creek by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |