Luxembourger vs Russian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Russian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Russians
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Russian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,837,676 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,911,881 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 0.97%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Russian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 47.5% |
Range | 35.9% | 45.0% |
Mean | 10.7% | 14.4% |
Median | 10.0% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 19.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Russians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Australia (13.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bolivia (13.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Scotland (13.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and Lithuanian (13.5%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Lithuanian (13.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Asian (13.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.6%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Bolivia (13.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 13.8% |