Luxembourger vs South African Family Households
COMPARE
Luxembourger
South African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Luxembourgers
South Africans
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs South African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,654,456 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 63.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,542,946 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 63.4%, a difference of 0.26%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | South African |
Minimum | 41.4% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 93.3% | 96.0% |
Range | 51.9% | 56.0% |
Mean | 67.9% | 68.7% |
Median | 67.5% | 65.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.2% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.7% | 81.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 19.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and South Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Potawatomi (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (63.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Slovak (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |
Icelanders | 0.8 /100 | #257 | Tragic 63.3% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.7 /100 | #258 | Tragic 63.2% |