Ute vs Armenian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Ute
Armenian
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Ute
Armenians
17.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Armenian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,501,714 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,860,735 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 46.9%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Armenian |
Minimum | 6.5% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 70.6% | 42.7% |
Range | 64.1% | 40.4% |
Mean | 32.1% | 12.3% |
Median | 23.3% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.2% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.9% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.7% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.2% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 0.60%), Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Russia (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Europe (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Laotian (12.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Soviet Union (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Moldova (12.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.4 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Russians | 99.4 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.4 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Soviet Union | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.2 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Armenians | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Laotians | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Sri Lankans | 99.1 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Lithuanians | 99.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |