Immigrants from China vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,614,379 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,979,827 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 12.6%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Czechoslovakian
Minimum	0.83%	2.7%
Maximum	42.3%	54.7%
Range	41.4%	51.9%
Mean	12.6%	24.4%
Median	10.7%	20.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.6%	13.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.9%	32.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.3%	19.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.2%	13.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.1%	13.1%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Okinawans	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.5%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Asians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.5%
Cypriots	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Swedes	99.8 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.6%
Turks	99.8 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.6%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.6%
Danes	99.8 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 13.6%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.8 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.6%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 13.8%
Luxembourgers	99.7 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 13.8%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.6 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 13.9%

Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.36%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Native Hawaiians	93.4 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 15.2%
Belgians	93.1 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 15.2%
South Africans	93.0 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 15.2%
Scottish	93.0 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Norway	92.3 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.3%
Tlingit-Haida	92.2 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.3%
Czechoslovakians	92.1 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 15.3%
Palestinians	91.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 15.4%
Carpatho Rusyns	91.1 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 15.4%
Canadians	90.6 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Brazil	90.3 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 15.4%
Mongolians	90.2 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	90.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	88.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 15.5%