Turkish vs Immigrants from Oceania Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Oceania
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Oceania
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
70.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Oceania Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,161,413 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,706,575 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 20.0%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 36.2% |
| Range | 15.5% | 35.1% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 15.4% |
| Median | 7.1% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 7.2% |
Similar Demographics by Receiving Food Stamps
Demographics Similar to Turks by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are French Canadian (11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Pennsylvania German (11.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Alsatian (11.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.5%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 81.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Lebanese | 81.6 /100 | #153 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Armenians | 81.4 /100 | #154 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 80.4 /100 | #155 | Excellent 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 75.6 /100 | #156 | Good 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.2 /100 | #157 | Good 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 72.6 /100 | #158 | Good 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 70.4 /100 | #159 | Good 11.4% |
| French Canadians | 69.5 /100 | #160 | Good 11.4% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.4 /100 | #161 | Good 11.4% |
| Alsatians | 68.0 /100 | #162 | Good 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 65.8 /100 | #163 | Good 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 65.0 /100 | #164 | Good 11.5% |
| Arabs | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 11.5% |