Turkish vs Immigrants from Austria Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Austria
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Austria
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Austria Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,161,413 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,584,591 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 0.030%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Austria |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 24.3% |
| Range | 15.5% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 8.1% |
| Median | 7.1% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Austria by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.5%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Austria are Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.5%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.6% |