Chilean vs Immigrants from Oceania Receiving Food Stamps

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,152,699 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,706,575 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 3.6%.

Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chilean	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	0.40%	1.1%
Maximum	30.3%	36.2%
Range	29.9%	35.1%
Mean	10.5%	15.4%
Median	10.5%	14.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.1%	11.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.5%	18.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.4%	6.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.4%	7.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.3%	7.2%

Demographics Similar to Chileans and Immigrants from Oceania by Receiving Food Stamps

In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Vietnam (11.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Syrian (11.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Hungarian (11.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and Celtic (10.9%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are French Canadian (11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Lebanon (11.3%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and Immigrants from Argentina (11.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Receiving Food Stamps
Celtics	87.8 /100 \| #140	Excellent 10.9%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	86.7 /100 \| #141	Excellent 11.0%
Chileans	86.2 /100 \| #142	Excellent 11.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	86.0 /100 \| #143	Excellent 11.0%
Syrians	85.5 /100 \| #144	Excellent 11.0%
Hungarians	85.1 /100 \| #145	Excellent 11.0%
Taiwanese	84.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 11.0%
Whites/Caucasians	83.9 /100 \| #147	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	83.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 11.1%
Brazilians	83.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 11.1%
Soviet Union	83.1 /100 \| #150	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Spain	81.7 /100 \| #151	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	81.7 /100 \| #152	Excellent 11.1%
Lebanese	81.6 /100 \| #153	Excellent 11.1%
Armenians	81.4 /100 \| #154	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Argentina	80.4 /100 \| #155	Excellent 11.2%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	75.6 /100 \| #156	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.2 /100 \| #157	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	72.6 /100 \| #158	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Oceania	70.4 /100 \| #159	Good 11.4%
French Canadians	69.5 /100 \| #160	Good 11.4%