Turkish vs Immigrants from Lithuania Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Lithuania
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Lithuania
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Lithuania Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,161,413 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,609,856 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.534 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 2.6%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Lithuania |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 23.4% |
| Range | 15.5% | 21.8% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 7.4% |
| Median | 7.1% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Lithuania by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Czech (9.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Bhutanese (9.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Sweden (9.3%, a difference of 0.37%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |