Turkish vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Turkish
Bhutanese
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Turks
Bhutanese
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,161,413 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,770,052 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 2.9%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 32.4% |
| Range | 15.5% | 31.4% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 10.2% |
| Median | 7.1% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Bhutanese by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Czech (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |