Turkish vs Cambodian Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Turkish
Cambodian
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Turks
Cambodians
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Cambodian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,161,413 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,416,117 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 0.60%.

Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Cambodian |
Minimum | 1.2% | 0.80% |
Maximum | 16.7% | 31.0% |
Range | 15.5% | 30.2% |
Mean | 7.6% | 9.0% |
Median | 7.1% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Cambodians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Immigrants from Netherlands (9.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from China (9.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and European (9.5%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Australians | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 9.6% |