Pennsylvania German vs Immigrants from Oceania Receiving Food Stamps

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,858,684 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.501 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,706,575 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.34%.

Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary

Measurement	Pennsylvania German	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	0.90%	1.1%
Maximum	83.5%	36.2%
Range	82.6%	35.1%
Mean	13.7%	15.4%
Median	8.9%	14.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.6%	11.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.0%	18.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.4%	6.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	16.6%	7.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	16.4%	7.2%

Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans and Immigrants from Oceania by Receiving Food Stamps

In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Alsatian (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), French Canadian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Chile (11.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and Arab (11.5%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are French Canadian (11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Alsatian (11.4%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (11.3%, a difference of 0.87%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Receiving Food Stamps
Soviet Union	83.1 /100 \| #150	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Spain	81.7 /100 \| #151	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	81.7 /100 \| #152	Excellent 11.1%
Lebanese	81.6 /100 \| #153	Excellent 11.1%
Armenians	81.4 /100 \| #154	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Argentina	80.4 /100 \| #155	Excellent 11.2%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	75.6 /100 \| #156	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.2 /100 \| #157	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	72.6 /100 \| #158	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Oceania	70.4 /100 \| #159	Good 11.4%
French Canadians	69.5 /100 \| #160	Good 11.4%
Pennsylvania Germans	68.4 /100 \| #161	Good 11.4%
Alsatians	68.0 /100 \| #162	Good 11.4%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	65.8 /100 \| #163	Good 11.5%
Immigrants \| Chile	65.0 /100 \| #164	Good 11.5%
Arabs	64.7 /100 \| #165	Good 11.5%
Immigrants \| Belarus	62.8 /100 \| #166	Good 11.5%
Kenyans	60.2 /100 \| #167	Good 11.6%
Tlingit-Haida	59.1 /100 \| #168	Average 11.6%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	58.3 /100 \| #169	Average 11.6%
Costa Ricans	57.9 /100 \| #170	Average 11.6%