Turkish vs Luxembourger Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Turkish
Luxembourger
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Turks
Luxembourgers
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Luxembourger Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,161,413 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,526,649 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362 and weighted average of 9.1%, a difference of 3.8%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 13.6% |
| Range | 15.5% | 13.1% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 6.0% |
| Median | 7.1% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Luxembourgers by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Bolivian (9.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (9.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Australia (9.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Eastern European (9.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.1%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |