Tohono O'odham vs Crow Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Crow
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Crow
34.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Crow Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,585,970 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549 and weighted average of 34.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,998,568 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 32.4%, a difference of 5.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Crow |
Minimum | 23.3% | 15.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 61.5% |
Range | 76.7% | 46.1% |
Mean | 57.1% | 39.3% |
Median | 53.5% | 40.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.2% | 28.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.5% | 48.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 54.3% | 19.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.4% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.8% | 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham and Crow by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 3.6%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 2.4%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 3.7%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |