Spanish American Indian vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Luxembourger
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Luxembourgers
7.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,069,372 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,792,583 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 81.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 3.0% | 0.35% |
Maximum | 21.3% | 15.5% |
Range | 18.4% | 15.1% |
Mean | 7.4% | 3.7% |
Median | 6.0% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 4.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Guatemalan (7.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Hopi (7.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (7.1%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Dominica (7.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from Armenia (7.1%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 0.61%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 0.76%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |