Slavic vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Slavic
Luxembourger
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Slavs
Luxembourgers
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,876,285 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.830 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,792,583 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 14.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 0.99% | 0.35% |
| Maximum | 40.0% | 15.5% |
| Range | 39.0% | 15.1% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 3.7% |
| Median | 5.1% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Canada (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (4.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Korea (4.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Macedonian (4.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Ukrainians | 99.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 0.61%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 0.76%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |