Italian vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Italian
Luxembourger
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Italians
Luxembourgers
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,685,630 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 4.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,792,583 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 4.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Italian | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 0.87% | 0.35% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 15.5% |
Range | 49.1% | 15.1% |
Mean | 4.3% | 3.7% |
Median | 3.1% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 4.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Italians and Luxembourgers by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Filipino (4.0%, a difference of 0.010%), German (4.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Czech (4.0%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 0.61%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 0.76%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |