Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Immigrants from Latvia
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Immigrants from Latvia
11.6%
POVERTY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,136,945 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,731,697 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 1.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 27.2% | 17.5% |
| Range | 26.0% | 15.6% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 9.1% |
| Median | 10.3% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Latvia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from China (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Scottish (11.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |