Ghanaian vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Turkish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ghanaians
Turks
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,052,408 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 35.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ghanaian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 41.8% | 71.9% |
| Range | 40.7% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 16.7% | 13.5% |
| Median | 16.8% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Osage (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |