Korean vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Korean
Turkish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Koreans
Turks
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 497,455,609 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 14.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 2.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Turkish |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 56.1% | 71.9% |
| Range | 54.0% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 13.5% |
| Median | 11.8% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Immigrants from Scotland (14.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Asia (14.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (14.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Bolivia (14.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Australia (14.0%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |