Ottawa vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ottawa
Turkish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ottawa
Turks
19.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,714,849 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 41.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ottawa | Turkish |
Minimum | 6.1% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 46.9% | 71.9% |
Range | 40.9% | 71.4% |
Mean | 20.4% | 13.5% |
Median | 19.1% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ottawa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Salvadoran (19.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Guyanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |