Samoan vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Samoan
Turkish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Samoans
Turks
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,807,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 14.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 64.0% | 71.9% |
| Range | 62.3% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 16.5% | 13.5% |
| Median | 14.8% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.5% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Samoans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |