Maltese vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Maltese
Turkish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Maltese
Turks
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,909,171 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 0.13%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 80.5% | 71.9% |
| Range | 79.3% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 18.7% | 13.5% |
| Median | 15.0% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.3% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.2% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.8%, a difference of 0.98%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.91%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |