Chinese vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Chinese Turks

COMPARE

Chinese

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw ChileanChineseChippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Turkish

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian TsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison

Chinese

Turks

Exceptional

12.3%

CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16

100.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

7th/ 347

METRIC RANK

13.7%

CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16

99.7/ 100

METRIC RATING

31st/ 347

METRIC RANK

Chinese vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,581,051 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 10.9%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chinese	Turkish
Minimum	2.5%	0.50%
Maximum	53.8%	71.9%
Range	51.4%	71.4%
Mean	15.2%	13.5%
Median	12.8%	11.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.5%	8.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.1%	15.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.6%	6.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.3%	11.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.2%	11.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| India	100.0 /100 \| #1	Exceptional 11.0%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 11.3%
Filipinos	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 11.4%
Tsimshian	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 11.5%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 11.8%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 12.3%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 12.3%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 12.4%
Immigrants \| Singapore	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 12.6%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 12.7%
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 12.7%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 12.9%
Burmese	99.9 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 13.0%
Okinawans	99.9 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 13.0%

Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%
Swedes	99.7 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 13.7%
Maltese	99.7 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 13.8%
Russians	99.6 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 13.9%
Lithuanians	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.6 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 13.9%