Mongolian vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Immigrants from Oceania
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,209,736 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 0.73% |
| Maximum | 23.4% | 30.3% |
| Range | 22.8% | 29.6% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 10.9% |
| Median | 7.5% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |