Mongolian vs Peruvian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Peruvian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Peruvians
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
68.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Peruvian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,209,736 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,496,768 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.556 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Peruvian |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 23.4% | 33.3% |
| Range | 22.8% | 32.5% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 9.5% |
| Median | 7.5% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Peruvians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Peruvians are Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |