Mongolian vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Mongolian
Immigrants from Oceania
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Mongolians
Immigrants from Oceania
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,347,726 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 10.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 9.8% | 20.2% |
| Range | 8.7% | 18.6% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 8.5% |
| Median | 5.2% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 4.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Venezuelan (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Argentinean (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.42%), Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |