French American Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
COMPARE
French American Indian
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
French American Indians
Immigrants from Oceania
10.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,838,011 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 17.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | French American Indian | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 0.73% |
| Maximum | 36.5% | 30.3% |
| Range | 33.5% | 29.6% |
| Mean | 13.9% | 10.9% |
| Median | 11.7% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to French American Indians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Potawatomi (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
| French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |