Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Oceania
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,162,841 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 12.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.73% |
| Maximum | 15.3% | 30.3% |
| Range | 14.0% | 29.6% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 10.9% |
| Median | 6.1% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Korean (7.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch (7.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Northern European (7.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Australian (7.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Asians | 98.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Finns | 98.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Europeans | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Macedonians | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Koreans | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Dutch | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |