Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Immigrants from Oceania
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,199,618 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 2.4%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.79% | 0.73% |
Maximum | 38.9% | 30.3% |
Range | 38.1% | 29.6% |
Mean | 9.3% | 10.9% |
Median | 7.6% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |