Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Immigrants from Oceania
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,666,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 14.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.73% |
| Maximum | 27.0% | 30.3% |
| Range | 25.8% | 29.6% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 10.9% |
| Median | 7.8% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |