Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Oceania
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,180,585 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 14.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 0.73% | 0.73% |
| Maximum | 19.0% | 30.3% |
| Range | 18.3% | 29.6% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 10.9% |
| Median | 6.7% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Tongan (7.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (7.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (7.7%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Swiss | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |